Get Permission Soumiya N, Ikram, and Puri: Retinopathy of prematurity in multiple births versus single births preterm, extremely preterm infants


Introduction

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is proliferative retinopathy of the developing retina, which is characterized by abnormal neovascularization of the retina. It occurs in pre-mature infants with low birth weight who are exposed to a high concentration of oxygen and it is considered to be the leading cause of visual morbidity in children worldwide with the estimation of 15 million babies born preterm annually. 1 It is an avoidable and treatable cause of childhood blindness.

Preterm birth (PTB) is that the most important cause of neonatal vision problems and India is the biggest contributor to the global burden of PTB. 2 Classification of preterm birth is based upon gestational age: extremely preterm (< 28 weeks), Very preterm (< 32 weeks), Moderate preterm (32 to<34 weeks), Late preterm (34 to <37weeks).

In 1942, terry described it first as “retrolental fibroplasia”. 3 The risk factors of ROP include, low gestational age and < 32weeks, low birth weight (<1500 g, especially <1250g), supplemental oxygen therapy, vitamin E deficiency, respiratory distress syndrome, asphyxia, shock and acidosis. The smaller a baby is at birth, the more chance to develop ROP but not all babies who are premature will develop ROP. An ROP epidemic occurred in the 1940s and early 1950s when hospitals used excessively high levels of oxygen in incubators to save the lives of premature infants.

In India, roughly, 1 in 1000 children is blind, and the incidence of ROP is recorded between 24% and 47%. Globally, more than 50,000 infants are getting affected by ROP per year.4 Most studies say that low birth weight and low gestational week are responsible for the development of ROP. Premature births result in relative hyperoxia resulting in excessive blood vessel growth. 5

A more recent study examined the ocular growth and refractive error development in premature infants (32- and 52-weeks postmenstrual age babies with or without ROP.6 Impaired vision, large refractive error mainly myopia, strabismus, and blindness may occur following severe ROP. 7 Screening for early identification of retinal damages should be carried out preferably by the ophthalmologist for the early detection of this preventable blindness. Screening protocols are still insufficient in India and other developing countries. This study aims to compare the Severity, Risk factors, Refractive status in preterm, extremely preterm infants between multiple and single births which will be helpful in indication and timely intervention can be given.

Materials and Methods

The comparative and cross-sectional study sample consisted of 49 neonates with birth weight less than 2300 gram and gestational age less than 37 weeks. The study had a total sample of 49 participants (n=49), out of which 27 participants were twin and 22 participants were single. The study adhered to the norms of the ethics committee and was initiated after approval by the Institutional Review board of Saveetha College of Allied Health Science (REF NO: SCAHS/IRB/2022/JULY/370). All participants parents were provided with informed consent and the entire steps and purpose of the study was explained. Neonates with birth weight less than 2300 grams and gestational age less than 37 weeks of single and multiple births were included. Neonates with cardiac respiratory, neurological or ocular anomalies (except ROP), babies with genetic disease and full-term babies were excluded.

Visual acuity assessment for up to three months was done on blink reflex and from 3 to 6-month visual acuity was measured by central steady maintained reflex. Retinoscopy was performed to measure the refractive status of a child and dilated fundus examination was done with indirect ophthalmoscopy.

Statistical software

Statistical significance was defined as 0.05 or less probability. We conducted statistical analysis and graph plotting using Sigma Plot 14.5 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, USA).

Results

Their zones and stages of retinopathy were recorded along with the risk factors. Association between stages/zones with group (ex-preterm/preterm), Association between stages/zones with group (single birth/multiple birth) and Association between stages and risk factors was tested. The following tables support the analysis.

From the Table 1, it is evident that most of the Ex-preterm Infants (18.4%) are in the stage -2, 8.2% of the ex-preterm are in stage-3 and 2% of the ex-preterm Infant are in stage 4. It is also noted that the Infant in ex-preterm has reached the stage-4. It is found from the analysis that there is a close association between zones and group (ex-preterm/preterm) and it is evident that most of the ex-preterm Infants (24.5%) fall in the second zone.

Table 2, it is evident that there is no significant association between zones and group (Single birth /Multiple birth). It is found from the analysis that there is close association between stages and group (Single birth /multiple birth). It is noted that most of the multiple birth Infant (18.4%) have reached the stage 2.

Table 3, it is observed through the Chi-square values the risk factors: OXYGEN (10.63, p=.024), SEPSIS (9.61, p=.041), NEC (16.08, p=.003) and CPAP (9.15, p=.048) are having significant association with Stages in retinopathy. However LSCS, RDS, IUGR, NNJ, APNEA, HYPOGLC and IVF are not having significant association with the Stages in retinopathy.

Oxygen

It is noted that most of the Infants 35.5% who has risk factor of OXYGEN have reached the stage – 2 and 16.1% of the Infant reached stage 3.

Sepsis

It is noted that most of the infants 37.9% who has risk factor of SEPSIS have reached the stage– 2 and 20.7% of the Infant reached stage 3.

NEC

It is noted that most of the infants 33.3% who has risk factor of NEC have reached the stage2.

Table 1

Association between stage, zones and group (ex-preterm/preterm)

Group

Total

Chi- Square

EX-Preterm Gestational week < 27 and birth weight < 1500gms

Preterm Gestational week 28-37 birth weight > 1500gms

Stage

0

Count

5

17

22

10.082* P=.026

% of Total

10.2%

34.7%

44.9%

1.00

Count

1

3

4

% of Total

2.0%

6.1%

8.2%

2.00

Count

9

7

16

% of Total

18.4%

14.3%

32.7%

3.00

Count

4

2

6

% of Total

8.2%

4.1%

12.2%

4.00

Count

1

0

1

% of Total

2.0%

0.0%

2.0%

Total

Count

20

29

49

% of Total

40.8%

59.2%

100.0%

Zone

1.00

Count

7

0

7

21.320** P=.000

% of Total

14.3%

0.0%

14.3%

2.00

Count

12

11

23

% of Total

24.5%

22.4%

46.9%

3.00

Count

1

18

19

% of Total

2.0%

36.7%

38.8%

Total

Count

20

29

49

% of Total

40.8%

59.2%

100.0%

[i] *Significant at 5% level – Stage

[ii] **Significant at 1% level -Zone

Table 2

Association between zone, stages and group (Single birth /Multiple birth)

Group

Total

Chi- Square

Single birth

Multiple birth

Stage

.00

Count

12

10

22

8.616* P=.027

% of Total

24.5%

20.5%

45%

1.00

Count

1

3

4

% of Total

2.0%

6.1%

8.2%

2.00

Count

7

9

16

% of Total

14.3%

18.4%

32.7%

3.00

Count

2

4

6

% of Total

4.1%

8.2%

12.2%

4.00

Count

0

1

1

% of Total

0.0%

2.0%

2.0%

Total

Count

22

27

49

% of Total

44.9%

55.1%

100.0%

Group

Total

Chi- Square

Single birth

Multiple birth

Zone

1.00

Count

2

5

7

1.232 P=.540

% of Total

4.1%

10.2%

14.3%

2.00

Count

10

13

23

% of Total

20.4%

26.5%

46.9%

3.00

Count

10

9

19

% of Total

20.4%

18.4%

38.8%

Total

Count

22

27

49

% of Total

44.9%

55.1%

100.0%

[i] *Significant at 5% level

[ii] **Significant at 1% level

Table 3

Association between risk factors and stages in retinopathy

Stages in retinopathy

.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Chi square

N

N %

N

N %

N

N %

N

N %

N

N %

LSCS

Yes

18

45.0%

3

7.5%

14

35.0%

5

12.5%

0

0.0%

4.91

No

4

44.4%

1

11.1%

2

22.2%

1

11.1%

1

11.1%

p=.293

RDS

Yes

11

35.5%

4

12.9%

11

35.5%

4

12.9%

1

3.2%

4.86

No

11

61.1%

0

0.0%

5

27.8%

2

11.1%

0

0.0%

p=.308

OXYGEN

Yes

11

35.5%

3

9.7%

11

35.5%

5

16.1%

0

0.0%

10.63*

No

11

61.1%

1

5.6%

5

27.8%

1

5.6%

1

3.2%

p=.024

SEPSIS

Yes

9

31.0%

2

6.9%

11

37.9%

6

20.7%

1

3.4%

9.61*

No

13

65.0%

2

10.0%

5

25.0%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

p=.041

IUGR

Yes

4

44.4%

0

0.0%

5

55.6%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

4.24

No

18

45.0%

4

10.0%

11

27.5%

6

15.0%

1

2.5%

p=.374

NNJ

Yes

12

52.2%

2

8.7%

7

30.4%

2

8.7%

0

0.0%

1.92

No

10

38.5%

2

7.7%

9

34.6%

4

15.4%

1

3.8%

p=.750

APNEA

Yes

5

33.3%

3

20.0%

6

40.0%

1

6.7%

0

0.0%

5.72

No

17

50.0%

1

2.9%

10

29.4%

5

14.7%

1

2.9%

p=.223

HYPOGLC

Yes

5

55.6%

1

11.1%

3

33.3%

0

0.0%

0

0.0%

1.973

No

17

42.5%

3

7.5%

13

32.5%

6

15.0%

1

2.5%

p=.741

NEC

Yes

1

33.3%

0

0.0%

1

33.3%

0

0.0%

1

33.3%

16.08**

No

21

45.7%

4

8.7%

15

32.6%

6

13.0%

0

0.0%

p=.003

IVF

Yes

5

45.5%

1

9.1%

3

27.3%

2

18.2%

0

0.0%

0.839

No

17

44.7%

3

7.9%

13

34.2%

4

10.5%

1

2.6%

p=.933

CPAP

Yes

3

33.3%

0

0.0%

4

44.4%

1

11.1%

1

11.1%

9.15*

No

19

47.5%

4

10.0%

12

30.0%

5

12.5%

0

0.0%

p=.048

Table 4

Single birth and multiple birth in retinopathy

Group

Total

Single birth

Multiple birth

Group

EX- PRETERM Gestational week < 27 and birth weight < 1500gms

Count

9

11

20

% of Total

18.4%

22.4%

40.8%

PRETERM Gestational week 28-37 and birth weight > 1500gms

Count

13

16

29

% of Total

26.5%

32.7%

59.2%

Total

Count

22

27

49

% of Total

44.9%

55.1%

100.0%

Table 5

Association between refractive status and groups (single / Multiple Birth)

Group

Total

Single birth

Multiple birth

Refractive Status

Myopia

Count

0

0

0

% of Total

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Hyperopia

Count

6

7

13

% of Total

12.24%

14.3%

26.53%

Astigmatism

Count

2

3

5

% of Total

4.08%

6.1%

10.20%

Compound Myopic astigmatim

Count

1

6

7

% of Total

2.04%

12.2%

14.28%

Compound Hyperopic astigmatism

Count

13

11

24

% of Total

26.5%

22.45%

48.97%

Total

Count

22

27

49

% of Total

44.9%

55.1%

100.0%

Table 6

Association between treatment and groups (single Birth/ Multiple Birth)

Group

Single birth (n=22)

Multiple birth (n=27)

Treatment

Laser

Count

4

4

%

18.1%

18.1%

Avastin

Count

2

2

%

9.09%

9.09%

Accentrix

Count

1

1

%

4.5%

4.5%

CPAP

It is noted that most of the infants 44.4% who has risk factor of CPAP have reached the stage2 and 11.1% of the Infant reached stage 3.

From Table 4, In the group of Ex-preterm infant, 18.4% of the infant are single birth and 22.4% of the infant is multiple birth. It is noted that in the group of Preterm categories, 26.5% of them are single birth, whereas 32.7% of them are multiple birth.

Table 5, it is found that the mostly compound hyperopic astigmatism is noted in both single 26.5% and multiple 22.45% groups. Table 6, Laser treatment accounts for 18.1%, in both single and multiple groups.

Discussion

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a proliferative retinopathy of the developing retina, which is characterized by abnormal neovascularization. Studies have shown that the rate of severe vision impairment is 26 times higher in infants weighing <1500g at birth than in infants weighing 2500 to 3499g. Thus, because multiple birth infants have a higher rate of prematurity and very low birth weight than singletons, they are believed to be at risk of more morbidity. However, it remains unclear whether the perinatal outcome of multiple- birth infants is worse than that of very low birth weight singletons.8 There has been extensive research on ROP incidence in the past years, however there is yet no consensus regarding which risk factors are the more significant predictors of ROP.9 This study investigated the severity of ROP in 49 preterm 28 - ≤ 37 weeks of gestational age, extremely preterm ≤27 weeks of gestational age at delivery of multiple and single births, there is statically significant difference was found regarding the severity of ROP between the groups. Extremely preterm infants of multiple births had a higher risk of ROP. It is observed that the risk factors: SEPSIS, NEC, oxygen, and CPAP are having significant association with stages in retinopathy. These risk factors more seen in multiple births. One of the studies conducted by Trivili et al., between 2008 and 2017 conducted that gestational age of premature infants ≤27 weeks of age showed advanced stage of ROP in comparison of gestational age of premature infants.> 27 weeks but ≤30 weeks of age. 10 Petricli LS et al., conducted a study between 2010 and 2016 in extremely premature infants who were ≤27 weeks of gestational age at birth and concluded that there was no difference between the groups in terms of multiple birth vs single births at ROP development and treatment. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Another study conducted by Boretea Cl et al., between 2017 and 2019. They concluded that logistic regression analysis of each risk factor revealed that ventilation treatment, surfactant treatment, CPAP treatment, GA and birth weight has a strongest correlation to ROP. 9

Conclusion

The infants who were born in low gestational age and lower birth weight of multiple birth are more prone to develop severe stage of retinopathy.13, 14, 15 Sepsis, oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure and necrotizing enterocolitis are risk factors has been linked to retinopathy of prematurity which was more seen in multiple births. The most frequent refractive error in both singleton and multiple births was compound hyperopic astigmatism. Laser treatment was mostly taken in both single and multiple birth.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgement

The author’s thanks Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, for their help in providing the instruments required for the research.

References

1 

C Gilbert A Fielder L Gordillo G Quinn R Semiglia P Visintin Characteristics of infants with severe retinopathy of prematurity in countries with low, moderate, and high levels of development: implications for screening programsPediatrics2005115551825

2 

AR Depa S R Gundabattula Recurrence risk of preterm births: a retrospective Indian studyJ Obstet Gynaecol20194079258

3 

T L Terry Retrolental fibroplasias in premature infantsTrans Am Ophthalmol Soc19444238396

4 

KR Murthy PR Murthy DA Shah MR Nandan N Benakappa comparison of profile of Retinopathy of prematurity in semi urban /rural and Urban NICUs in Karnataka, IndiaBr J Ophthalmol20139766879

5 

RA Saunders ML Donahue LM Christmann AV Pakalnis B Tung RJ Hardy Racial variation in Retinopathy of Prematurity.The cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity cooperative groupArch Ophthalmol199711556048

6 

A Cook S White B Mark C David Ocular growth and refractive error development in premature infants without retinopathy of prematurityInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci200344395360

7 

P Vijayalakshmi T Kara C Gilbert ocular morbidity associated with retinopathy of prematurity in Treated and untreated eyes: A review of the literature and data from a tertiary eye - carecenter in Sothern IndiaIndian pediatr201653213742

8 

R Friling R Axer-Siegel Z Hersocovici D Weinberger L Sirota M Snir Retinopathy of prematurity in assisted versus natural conception and singleton versus multiple birthsOphthalmology200711423214

9 

CI Borțea F Stoica M Boia ER Iacob M Dinu R Iacob Risk Factors Associated with Retinopathy of Prematurity in Very and Extremely Preterm Infants Medicina (Kaunas)202157542010.3390/medicina57050420

10 

A Trivli M Polychronaki C Matalliotaki M Papadimas AE Patelarou N Dermitzaki The Severity of Retinopathy in the Extremely Premature InfantsInt Sch Res Notices2017478127910.1155/2017/4781279

11 

İS Petriçli C Kara N Demirel DUş Işık AY Baş Retinopathy of prematurity in extremely premature infants: multiple births versus single birthsTurk J Med Sci20184811315

12 

M Riazi-Esfahani Y Alizadeh R Karkhaneh MR Mansouri M Kadivar M Nili Retinopathy of Prematurity: Single versus Multiple-Birth PregnanciesJ Ophthalmic Vis Res2008314751

13 

İS Petriçli C Kara DU Işık N Demirel A Yağmur Effect of birth weight on retinopathy of prematurity in discordant twin pairsIndian J Ophthalmol201967680610

14 

SJ Kim AD Port R Swan JP Campbell RV Paul Chan MF Chiang Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Review of Risk Factors and their Clinical SignificanceSurv Ophthalmol201863561837

15 

GA Varley D Huang CJ Rapuano S Schallhorn BSB Wachler A Sugar LASIK for hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism: a report by the American Academy of OphthalmologyOphthalmology20041118160417

16 

RP Maurya Retinopathy of prematurity: An updateIndian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol20184312



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 17-03-2024

Accepted : 15-04-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijooo.2024.004


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 788

PDF Downloaded: 264