Introduction
Allergic fungal sinusitis a non-invasive pansinusitis that occurs in young immunocompetent individuals, with a strong history of atopy and elevated levels of total immunoglobulin IgE and peripheral eosinophilia. It is histologically characterized by the presence of allergic mucin and scattered fungal hyphae. 1 It was Young et al who first described allergic fungal sinusitis in 1978. They described a case with pan sinusitis with bone erosion. 2 The condition “Allergic fungal sinusitis” as a clinical entity was described in 1981 by Millar et al. 3 Allergic fungal sinusitis is a noninvasive, but vigorous, inflammatory response to mold that occurs in immunocompetent patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyposis (Figure 1). It typically occurs in patients who have a history of atopic disease. 4 In the sinus cavity thick fungal debris and mucin having carbohydrate-rich glycoprotein develops during the course of this disease. 4 This mucin is characteristically known as “Allergic mucin”. Patients with allergic fungal sinusitis commonly suffer from asthma. 5 It is IgE mediated.
Diagnostic criteria for allergic fungal sinusitis (Bent-Kuhn criteria)
Gross production of eosnophilic mucin containing non-invasive fungal hyphae.
Nasal polyposis.
Characteristic radiological findings.
Immunocompetence.
Allergic mucin.
Clinical findings in these patients include:
Signs of nasal mucosal inflammation
Nasal polyposis
Facial disfigurement
Orbital abnormalities in form of proptosis, epiphora and visual Loss.
Various ophthalmic manifestations of allergic fungal sinusitis include proptosis, diplopia, blepharoptosis, epiphora, opthalmoplegia, orbital abscesses and rarely visual loss. 6 The pathophysiology of visual loss in patients with allergic fungal sinusitis could be either compression of the optic nerve directly or indirectly or by optic neuritits.
Radiological characteristics of allergic fungal sinusitis:
Classically asymmetrical involvement of paranasal sinuses are seen in plain radiographs and CT imaging.
Bone erosion with extension of the disease to adjacent areas seen due to pressure effect. 7
Sinus expansion with the presence of bone erosion. 8
Heterogenous areas of signal intensities in sinus cavities filled with allergic mucin is seen in CT imaging. This is due to accumulation of heavy metals like iron and manganese.
‘Double density’ sign is usually caused by the dense inspissated eosinophil-rich extramucosal allergic mucin
This study was undertaken to know the incidence and treatment outcomes of various ocular manifestations of Allergic Fungal Pan Sinusitis.
Materials and Methods
A prospective study was done in a teaching hospital after obtaining ethical clearance from the institute. The study included 18 cases which were diagnosed to have allergic fungal pansinusitis from 2014-16. Patients had history of gradual nasal obstruction, history of allergy and previous sinus disease. Some of the patients were diagnosed by otorhinolaryngology department and were referred to us to rule out any ocular manifestations and some patients presented directly to Ophthalmology OPD with ocular complaints resulting because of AFPS. On clinical suspicion of AFPS when history was elicited they also had h/o suggestive of allergy and chronic sinus disease. They were also examined by ENT surgeon. The mucin was sent for microscopic examination to look for presence of eosinophils and charcot-layden crystals. CT scan of para nasal sinuses, brain and orbit were done in all cases. The diagnosis was made based on Bent–Kuhn criteria and analysis of CT scan reports of these patients. Those cases with ophthalmic involvement were studied for various features. Treatment was planned according to the manifestations. All the cases were treated with oral prednisolone 1mg/kg body weight for 2 weeks along with nasal steroid spray followed by which debridement was done through endonasal approach which was lead by a team of ENT surgeon, oculoplastic surgeon and neurosurgeon. Histopathological examination was done. Following surgery the oral steroids were continued for 2 more weeks in tapering dose. Follow up was done every day for first week followed by weekly once till a month and every 6 monthly once for a year in the form of clinical examination, CT scan was repeated after a week during post op period. In cases with suspected recurrence CT PNS was performed. Their outcomes were analyzed.
Results
Out of 18 cases which were diagnosed with AFPS only 6 (33%) cases had ophthalmic manifestations.
Out of 18 patients 10 (55.5%) were male, 8 (44.4%) were females. Among the individuals with ocular involvement males were 4 in number (0.22%) and females were 2(0.11%). The patient with youngest age was 15yrs and oldest was 38 yrs. The disease was unilateral in 11 cases (61.1%) and bilateral in 7 cases(38.8%).
Ophthalmic involvement was unilateral in all cases surprisingly. Proptosis was the most common (28%) (Figure 2, Figure 4) finding followed by epiphora (22.2%),
ophthalmoparesis (22.2%), diplopia (22.2%), ophthalmoplegia (11%), complete loss of vision (5%)(Table 1).
Ct scan showed bilateral nasal and sinus involvement in 11 cases and unilateral in 7 cases. (Figure 5, Figure 6). Orbital involvement was seen in 6 cases. It was unilateral in all cases. Only 1 case had involvement of optic nerve and intracranial extension. (Figure 7)
Following the surgery which included debulking of the granuloma, it was observed that proptosis (Figure 3, Figure 5), epiphora were recovered early (in 3 days). While ophthalmoparesis, ophthalmoplegia recovered over a period of 2weeks. There was no gain of vision in the case with visual loss.
Discussion
Allergic fungal pansinusitis is an allergic response to the fungal antigens in sinonasal cavities. It occurs in young immunocompetent people with h/o sinus disease, atopy, asthma. There occurs pressure necrosis and erosion of the sinus walls because of this granuloma there by leading to expansion of sinus walls, extension of this granuloma into other neighboring cavities. Orbital involvement is less common complication of this disease and orbital involvement usually occurs due to breech in the medial orbital wall.
In our study we found the incidence of ocular manifestations of AFPS as 0.33% (6 of 18). In a study by Ali. H et al 9 the incidence of ocular manifestations in AFPS was 27 out of 60(0.45%) which was almost similar to that of our study. Male to female ratio is 1.25:1. It is almost similar to that of incidences of study series conducted by Thahim et al, 10 Richard D deshazoin 11 which there was male preponderance. But in study conducted by Scott C Manning, 12 Zakirullah et al 13 there was female preponderance. In our study age of patients ranged from 6yrs to 36 yrs among which / majority were in the age group of second decade which was similar to few studies. 11, 14 The clinical features depend upon the extent of involvement which can be orbital, intracranial. In our study proptosis was the most common (28%) finding followed by epiphora (22.2%), ophthalmoparesis (22.2%), diplopia (22.2%), ophthalmoplegia (11%), complete loss of vision (5%) among 18 cases of AFPS. The rest had no ocular involvement. In a study by Zakirulla et al 13 proptosis was the most common ocular manifestation. Orbits being in close proximity to the sinuses they are the ones to be commonly involved leading to proptosis. Diplopia occurs due to impingement of extra ocular muscles by the granuloma. In one case we had the patient presenting to us with complete loss of vision which was gradual. It was due to the compression of the optic nerve. In the same case there was involvement of anterior cranial fossa which occurred due to breach in the ethmoidal bone.
Unilateral presentation was high in our study similar to studies by Bent & Kuhn 15 Sohail et al 16 and Thahim et al. 10
Intra op findings were extensive nasal polyposis with thick mucin which was of pea nut butter appearance were present. The debrided tissue was sent for HPE which showed fungal hyphae, eosinophils, charcot laden crystals in all cases. Tissue infiltration is not seen in AFPS in contrast to invasive fungal diseases because it is the saprophytic growth occurring in the degenerated tissue which occurs because of allergic response elicited due to fungal antigens.
Post-operative recovery was seen for proptosis initially in our study similar to that of study by Ali. H. et al. 9 There was no recovery of vision in the case with optic nerve compression which remained PL-ve in spite of surgical debridement.
Recurrence was noted in only 2 cases among 18 which occurred at the end of 1 year. It was limited to the sinuses itself for which oral steroids were started and tapered over 3 weeks period after which improvement occurred and there was no need for surgery.
The main drawback of our study was that we didn’t estimate the serum levels of IgE, which is an important tool in diagnosis due to financial constraints of the patients.
Conclusion
AFPS is a disease involving young and immune competent individuals. It has orbital involvement. Early diagnosis and treatment of Allergic Fungal Pan Sinusitis can lead to the complete recovery from ocular manifestations except for vision blinding effects.