Get Permission Solu and Panchal: Ocular side effects of anti-tubercular drugs in patients receiving Anti-Tb treatment at tertiary care center


Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) has been present since 460 BC, as the most widespread disease of the time, and it was fatal. The causative organism of TB is Mycobacterium tuberculosis which is a slow-growing bacterium, acquired by deposition of aerosol droplets via inhalation.1 TB is still the most common infectious disease and a major public health problem, infecting millions of people worldwide. India accounts for about a quarter of the global TB burden.2 Carr and Henkind in 1962 first described the ocular side effect of Ethambutol.3 Ethambutol is generally well tolerated, but it is known to cause optic neuritis, more specifically retrobulbar neuritis.4 Ethambutol causes two types of optic neuritis: one is axial neuritis (central) and the other one is paraxial neuritis (peripheral). The central fibers of the optic nerve are most commonly affected, causing blurred vision, decreased visual acuity, central scotomas, and often loss of the ability to detect red and green. The peripheral fibers of the optic nerve are less commonly involved, so that visual acuity and colour vision may not be affected, but peripheral constriction of the visual fields occurs.5 The exact pathophysiology of ethambutol optic neuropathy has not yet been identified. Mitochondrial disturbance, the zinc-chelating effect and its metabolite are the possible underlying mechanisms.6 EMB toxicity is related to the dose and duration of treatment and in most of the cases it is reversible, but may occasionally become irreversible resulting in permanent visual impairment especially in the older population. It has been said that there is no so-called “safe-dosage” for EMB.7 Isoniazid can rarely cause retro bulbar neuritis.4 Rifampicin can produce orange colour tears and orange staining of contact lenses.8 There are a number of uncertain and difficult areas in the recommendation of preventive measures against drug-induced ocular toxicity during anti-TB treatment. The management of EMB induced optic neuropathy involves immediate discontinuation of the drug.4 If the optic neuritis fails to improve within 6 weeks after stopping EMB, INH should also be stopped. Pyridoxine 25-100 mg/day may be considered in isoniazid induced toxic neuropathy, particularly for those with risk factors like malnutrition, alcoholics.7

Materials and Methods

This study is an observational follow up study. Initially 100 patients of newly diagnosed drug susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis, referred to ophthalmology OPD in a tertiary care hospital were examined. Out of 100 study participants, six participants were lost to follow up after few months of DOTs therapy, hence excluded. Thus total 94 participants had completed prescribed number of follow ups and contributed in follow up study. All the patients enrolled in the study were evaluated during a period from May 2018 - October 2019. These patients were examined and investigated thoroughly as per the protocol after approval from the institutional ethical committee, at ophthalmic OPD using airborne precautions.

Inclusion criteria

New cases of drug susceptible pulmonary TB receiving standard HRZE treatment regimen under DOTs therapy were included. Standard HRZE ATT regime (H = isoniazid, R = rifampicin, Z = pyrazinamide, E = Ethambutol) followed H: 4-6 mg/kg body weight, R: 8-12 mg/kg body weight, Z: 20-30 mg/kg body weight, E: 15-25 mg/kg body weight. Adult patients (age > 18 years) and those who gave informed written consent to participate in the study were included.

Exclusion criteria

All MDR-TB and XDR-TB category patients and who has received anti TB drugs in past. Patients having any major systemic illness (Diabetes mellitus, Hypertension, renal disease, demyelinating disease) and patients having preexisting posterior segment pathology that might affect visual acuity like diabetic retinopathy, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal detachment, optic atrophy etc. Patients having mature cataract or dense ocular media opacity. Patients with preexisting colour vision defects. Patients who are on medications which can cause optic neuropathy like phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors, amiodarone, linezolid as well as patients who are on medications that can affect colour vision like oral contraceptives, digoxin, indomethacin were excluded form study.

Methodology

After initial enrolments, all patients of newly diagnosed pulmonary TB on standard HRZE regimen were examined thoroughly before initiating ATT and thereafter every month up to 6 months during a period from May 2018 to October 2019. Socio demographic data with patient’s personal identification information was recorded. Detailed clinical history including dietary habit, addiction to tobacco, alcohol, any other medication, any ocular trauma or surgery was noted. External examination of eyes and pupillary reflex were noted on torch light examination. All the patients were evaluated for best corrected visual acuity by illuminated Snellen chart for 20 feet distance. Visual acuity loss was counted if it had exceeded two lines in Snellen chart between each monthly ophthalmic examination in the absence of other causal factors. Colour vision was assessed using Ishihara chart. Subjects were tested while wearing best correction. The patients are made to read the plates in adequate daylight held at distance of 75 cm from the subject and tilted so that the plane of the paper was perpendicular to the line of vision. Out of plates 1-21 if >13 plates are read correctly, the colour vision was regarded as normal. If only 9 or fewer plates were read correctly, colour vision was regarded as deficient. Slit lamp biomicroscopy was performed with Appasamy AIA-11 5S slit lamp, for anterior segment evaluation. Detailed fundus examination was done with indirect ophthalmoscope and slit lamp bio microscopy with +78D lens (Volk) for posterior segment pathology. Visual field testing was done using the Carl Zeiss Meditec HFA 2 Humphrey field analyzer with 30-2 threshold programme, with dim ambient light source with full refractive correction. Examination was repeated until reliable fields were obtained. Only those fields that were reliably performed were included in the analyses. All participants were called every month for follow up detailed ophthalmic examination up to 6 months. Differences between baseline and follow‑up findings were noted. Statistics analysis has been done using - Epi info 7 & SPSS v19. The McNemar Chi-square test was applied to compare statistical difference in visual function among tuberculosis patients before and after initiating of ATT. The P value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Initially 100 patients of newly diagnosed drug susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis were examined. Out of 100 study participants, six participants did not turn up for follow up after few months of DOTs therapy, hence excluded. Thus total 188 eyes of 94 study participants were analyzed. Mean age of the patients is 33.66 year with maximum number of patients being in age group 18-30 years (54.25%). There were 52 (55.32%) males and 42 (44.68%) females.

Out of 188 eyes of 94 participants, 178 eyes of 89 patients had best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 on baseline examination while 10 eyes of five patients had baseline best corrected visual acuity ranging from 20/30 to 20/60; which was found to be due to cataract in these patients. Thus baseline best corrected visual acuity was ranged from 20/20 to 20/60. All the patients were followed up at monthly interval up to 6 months and their visual acuity was tested, during which we found that decline in visual acuity from baseline was seen in 14 eyes of seven patients (7.44%) in which 4 eyes of two patients had drop in visual acuity at 4th month follow up, 8 eyes of four patients had drop in visual acuity at 5th month follow up and 2 eyes of one patient at 6th month follow up. (Table 1. Visual acuity changes from baseline in participants during six month follow up study) On using McNemar Chi-Square Test these difference of visual acuity at baseline and at 6th month from baseline were found (Chi-Square value – 4.3, p value – 0.03) statistically significant.

Baseline colour vision was found to be normal in 188 eyes of 94 study participants. Colour vision was assessed using Ishihara colour vision plates. During study, it was observed that out of 188 eyes, 10 eyes of five patients (5.32%) showed colour vision abnormality at the end of 6 month follow up. These differences in colour vision status between baseline and at the end of 6th month from baseline (p=0.001, Chi square value is 10.56) were statistically significant. (Table 2. Colour vision changes in study participants during six month follow up.) It was observed that among 188 eyes, eight eyes of four patients had developed optic disc changes from baseline at the end of six month follow up. Out of these eight eyes, four eyes of two patients (2.12%) had temporal pallor and other four eyes of 2 patients (2.12%) had early disc edema.

No visual field changes were found on baseline evaluation in all 188 eyes. At the end of six month follow up study 10/188 (5.32%) eyes developed changes in their visual fields from baseline. Out of 10 eyes, four eyes had developed changes at 4th month follow up and six eyes had developed changes at 5th month follow up. The most common defect seen was cecocentral scotoma in four (2.12%) eyes out of 188 eyes. Other defects seen were peripheral constriction (1.06%), peripheral defect in different quadrant (1.06%) and central scotoma (1.06%). (Table 3. Visual field changes from baseline in study participants during six month follow up.) These differences in visual field defects from baseline and after six months from baseline (p = 0.001 and Chi square value = 9.7) were statistically significant. Fourteen eyes of seven participants had developed ocular manifestations attributed to ATT toxicity, out of which two patients had developed manifestations at 4th month follow up after start of ATT, four patients at 5th month follow up and one patient at 6th month follow up. Thus average duration for development of ocular manifestations attributed to ATT toxicity was 5th month after initiating ATT. (Figure 1)

Table 1

Visual acuity changes from baseline in participants during six month follow up study.

Visual acuity 20/20 <20/20 to 20/60 <20/60 to 20/200 <20/200
Baseline 178 (94.68%) 10 (5.32%) 0 0
1st month follow up 178 (94.68%) 10 (5.32%) 0 0
2ndmonth follow up 178 (94.68%) 10 (5.32%) 0 0
3rd month follow up 178 (94.68%) 10 (5.32%) 0 0
4thmonth follow up 174 (92.55%) 12 (6.38%) 2(1.06%) 0
5thmonth follow up 166 (88.29%) 14 (7.44%) 8(4.25%) 0
6thmonth follow up 164 (87.23%) 16 (8.51%) 8(4.25%) 0
Table 2

Colour vision changes in study participants during six month follow up.

Colour vision No of new eyes affected
Baseline 0
1st month follow up 0
2ndmonth follow up 0
3rdmonth follow up 0
4thmonth follow up 4(2.12%)
5thmonth follow up 6(3.19%)
6thmonth follow up 0
Total no of New eyes affected 10(5.32%)
Table 3

Visual field changes from baseline in study participants during six month follow up.

Perimetry Cecocentral scotoma Peripheral constriction Peripheral defects in different quadrants Bitemporal hemianopia
Baseline 0 0 0 0
1 Month followup 0 0 0 0
2 Month followup 0 0 0 0
3 Month followup 0 0 0 0
4 Month followup 0 2 (1.06%) 0 0
5 Month followup 04 (2.12%) 0 2 (1.06%) 0
6 Month followup 0 0 0 0
Total no of new eyes affected 10 (5.32%)
Figure 1

Line chart showing duration of development of ocular manifestation after initiation of ATT.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/16c78942-a0b5-49e0-8d7f-aa883f7aa564image1.png

Discussion

Ethambutol is being used to treat tuberculosis since the 1960s. The potential for visual impairment was recognized soon after its introduction. The incidence of EMB ocular toxicity has been reported in various ways. Leibold JE et al reported the incidence of ethambutol toxicity depending on dosage. 9 It was found to be 18% in patients taking ethambutol more than 35 mg/kg/day, 5% in patients on 25 mg/kg/day, 3% among those on 20 mg/kg/day while negligible toxicity was seen in patients taking ethambutol 15 mg/kg/day stressing the importance of dosage on toxicity. Polak BC et al had reported that Ethambutol causes optic neuropathy in 1-5% of patients using anti-tuberculous medications. 10 Clarke et al in 1972 stated that a cumulative dose of 150 g is considered critical dose for ethambutol toxicity 11. Citron observed that optic nerve toxicity developed usually after two months of therapy. 5 This was also evident in present study.

In our study colour vision was tested with Ishihara pseudo isochromatic colour vision test while in Garg P et al study colour vision was tested using both Ishihara and Farnsworth D-15 colour vision test. 12 In the study; 128 eyes of 64 patients of category 1 and 2 were evaluated, of which colour vision abnormalities were noted in 16 eyes of eight patients (p value= 0.003). Out of these 16 eyes, four eyes showed impairment in red-green colour perception and the others showed impairment in blue-yellow colour perception. All abnormalities were noted by Farnsworth Panel D-15 test, while the Ishihara pseudo isochromatic test showed abnormality in only one participant. Since present study was done using Ishihara colour plates, the subtle colour vision defects may not be detected. Wong JKW et al in 2013 also demonstrated that Farnsworth D-15 hue test appears to be more sensitive than the Ishihara pseudo-isochromatic plates in detecting colour defects as an initial subjective screening tool for suspected ethambutol-related optic neuropathy. 13

In our study 10/188 (5.32%) eyes developed visual field defects, in which the most common defect seen was centrocecal scotoma (2.12%). Bharamshetter RS conducted a study in which 160 eyes of 80 patients who were started on ATT under RNTCP were analyzed. 14 Visual field defects were seen in 10 (6.25%) eyes out of 160 eyes, in which (40%) had centrocecal defects, (40%) central defect, (20%) had paracentral defects and (20%) had nerve fiber defect. It was concluded in study that the field defects were dose dependent and statistically significant at the level of p<0.001. In Mahrukh et al study, 198 eyes of 100 patients (two patients were one eyed) were analyzed and at the end of two months of ATT. 15 It was seen that 27/198 (13.63%) eyes developed changes in their visual fields. The most common defect seen was the peripheral defects in different quadrants (8.1%). Other defects seen were peripheral constriction of the isopter (3.03%), central scotoma (1.01%) and bitemporal hemianopia (1.01%). Garg P also noted in his study that four patients had developed field defects (6.3%) after 2 months of ATT. 12

There is not a single simple diagnostic test that can be confirming or diagnostic for ATT toxicity. For our patients, the diagnosis EMB ocular toxicity was based on new onset of ocular symptoms compatible with ATT-related toxicity such as diminished visual acuity from baseline, altered colour vision perception, development of visual field defects and lack of an alternative explanation for the new ocular symptoms. These all three parameters of optic nerve function were taken into account to clinically diagnose a case of toxic optic neuropathy related to ATT. Out of 14 eyes of seven patients who developed changes from baseline, five patients were diagnosed to have drug induced toxic optic neuropathy taking all three parameters of optic nerve function. In rest two patients, one had decline of three line in Snellen’s visual acuity chart from baseline, but other parameters were within normal limits. Other patient had two line decline of visual acuity from baseline, but other parameters were within normal limits. In these two patients decline in visual acuity could be attributed to any other causal factors like patient fatigue, lack of cooperation from patient, and technical errors. A regular follow up of these patients was done to see development of any changes in visual fields or colour vision. Thus in present study out of 188 eyes, 10 eyes (5.31%) had shown Ethambutol toxicity on standard drug dosage of (20+3.0 mg/kg/day). Bobrowitz et al in his study also concluded that fluctuations in the reading of the snellen’s eye chart probably do not reflect the side effect of the drugs, but rather the influence of other factors. 16 Further, he emphasized that a drop in visual acuity from optic nerve or retinal damage would be expected to show associated changes in the visual field pattern. If this did not take place, there was no certain visual toxicity in the cases.

Limitations of study: In present study colour vision was assessed using Ishihara colour plates. Colour vision assessment with both Ishihara and Farnsworth D-15 hue test will be far more sensitive and yield better results in identifying drug induced colour vision defects.

Conclusion

In study of evaluation of visual function in patients receiving ATT at recommended doses, we found that ocular toxicity was seen in a significant number of patients (5.31%). The ocular toxicity of ethambutol in our patients had manifested in the form of changes in visual acuity, colour vision, visual field and fundoscopy picture. We conclude that mandatory ophthalmic examination using sensitive indicators at monthly intervals is paramount and that, along with discontinuation of the offending drug when possible, constitutes the basis of treatment of drug-induced optic neuropathy in such patients. There is a requisite to formulate guidelines for mandatory baseline ophthalmic evaluation before initiation of treatment and then at regular intervals throughout the treatment. Educating patients about toxicity of ethambutol is a crucial factor in treatment of tuberculosis.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

J H Jorgensen J D Turnidge P R Murray Antimicrobial agents and susceptibility testingManual of clinical microbiologyASM PressWashington, DC199514971662

2 

A Kanabus Information about Tuberculosis, Global Health Education2018www.tbfacts.org

3 

R E Carr P Henkind Ocular manifestations of ethambutol: Toxic amblyopia after administration of an experimental antituberculosis drugArch Ophthalmol19626756671

4 

S B Kokkada R Barthakur M Natarajan S Palaian A K Chhetri P Mishra Ocular side effects of antitubercular drugs-a focus on prevention, early detection and managementKathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)20053443841

5 

K M Citron G O Thomas Ocular toxicity from ethambutol.Thorax198641107379

6 

P Makunyane S Mathebula Update on ocular toxicity of ethambutolAfr Vis Eye Health20167514

7 

Preventive measures against drug-induced ocular toxicity during anti-tuberculous treatment (general recommendations). Annual Report. Hong Kong: Department of Health2002

8 

G L Muntingh Drug and Contact Lens InteractionsSouth Afr Family Pract200547248

9 

James E. Leibold The ocular toxicity of ethambutol and its relation to doseAnn New York Acad Sci196613529049

10 

B.C.P. Polak M. Leys G.H.M. van Lith Blue-Yellow Colour Vision Changes as Early Symptoms of Ethambutol OculotoxicityOphthalmol198519142236

11 

G.B.Marshall Clarke J Cuthbert R.J. Cuthbert A.W. Lees Isoniazid plus ethambutol in the initial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosisBr J Dis Chest1972662726

12 

P Garg R Garg R Prasad A K Mishra A prospective study of ocular toxicity in patients receiving ethambutol as a part of directly observed treatment strategy therapyLung India20153211629

13 

J K Wang G S Yau J W Lee C Y Yuen Detection of early ethambutol ocular toxicity: Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates versus the Farnsworth D-15 hue testJ Neurophysiol Neural Disord2014110214

14 

R S Bhramshetter Visual Field defects in patients of tuberculosis on ethambutolJ Evid Based Med Health Care20174313237

15 

Ashraf A Mahrukh Bhat Mohd A Visual field changes in patients receiving antitubercular drug therapy at tertiary care hospital: an analytical observational studyInt J Contemp Med Res2017423469

16 

I D Bobrowitz D E Robins Ethambutol-isoniazid versus PAS-isoniazid in original treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis19679642838



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijooo.2020.042


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 4406

PDF Downloaded: 1934



Medical Abbreviation List